Re: [foaf-protocols] ACL

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> · Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:47:27 +0100

Nathan,

That sort of reminds me of something [1] ;)

So, I asked a round a bit [2] and the answer essentially was: go register
one ... fancy doing it together?

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://webofdata.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/wod-access-control-discovery/
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JanMar/0218.html

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

> From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
> Organization: webr3
> Reply-To: <nathan@webr3.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:37:41 +0100
> To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, foaf-protocols
> <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>
> Subject: [foaf-protocols] ACL
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I'm just trying to get an implementation of web access control [1] off
> the ground and have hit upon a small issue.
> 
> I'm planning on exposing links to acl files via the Link header as
> directed, however I've realised there is no rel="" for it, hence i was
> opting for a custom temporary type. On a first look a relation of
> acl:acl looks to be the one, but after checking the actual ontology the
> acl:acl link simply isn't there, thus in the meantime I've opted for:
> 
> Link: </.wac/everyone.n3>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#";
> title="Access Control File"
> 
> Any improvements, or refinements welcome, as the above is just a
> temporary measure.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Nathan
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols