W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Best practices: representing homonym relationships in SKOS

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:07:41 -0500
Message-Id: <E53F4C64-4DDE-44C5-83D8-F53CBE4D53C1@la-grange.net>
Cc: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
To: public-lod@w3.org

Le 12 nov. 2009 à 19:55, Bradley Allen a écrit :
> is there any best practice or, failing that, good ideas for  
> representing
> homonymy in SKOS?


    homophone: same sound, different meaning
or homograph: same graph, different meaning

Maybe a better list is public-swd-wg@w3.org

The use case has been mentioned in 2006 but not directly addressed
http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-swd-wg&index-type=t&keywords=homonymy&search=Search

But it is a domain where it matters for VoiceXML, in PLS 1.0
Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) Version 1.0

There are two sections on homophone and homographe
http://www.w3.org/TR/pronunciation-lexicon/#S5.4


-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2009 12:07:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:20:54 UTC