- From: Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:08:16 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>, public-lod@w3.org
Hi Kingsley, 2009/3/6 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>: > Tom Heath wrote: >> >> Hi Kingsley, Hi John, >> >> First off, sympathies John for the roasting on Facebook - not a nice >> experience I'm sure. >> >> Re your question Kingsley... I should be careful what I say, don't >> wanna give anyone any ideas ;) >> >> Seriously though, regarding Revyu, while I developed the site, the IP >> currently rests with the OU (part of the terms of my PhD), so the >> picture gets even more complicated than it is already. There have been >> some varied outcomes AFAIR in UK courts regarding the relative >> culpability of messengers (i.e. sites) vs reviewers in reviewing >> scenarios. Naturally IANAL, but apparently the defamation laws in the >> UK are some of the most draconian around, so you're right to be >> cautious John (sad though it is). >> >> The most comparable experience from Revyu involved a review of a >> garage; it's documented here in a way that prevents this blogger being >> sued but retains the text online (and tells the account of the threats >> received); note how the text is constructed: >> >> http://doodznchyx.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/mot-mechanic-in-milton-keynes-chilling-free-speech/ >> >> So as that post says, I took the review down when an email was sent >> threatening to get the lawyers involved, but I also logged the >> takedown notice in the Chilling Effects database >> <http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi> (now this would be AWESOME >> as linked data) so that it didn't go unrecorded. I'm also very >> grateful to Martin Poulter for blogging about it at the address above. >> >> Since then I have moderated a few reviews voluntarily (I don't like >> doing this, but it seems to be a sensible precaution for all parties) >> but no more threats have been received. In my experience most people >> are less reactionary than the garage and the people you and I >> encountered. Some places have had bad reviews followed by a number of >> highly positive reviews (perhaps even by friends of the owner, who >> knows). In fact, this would be my first response to angry reviewees - >> if you disagree then write your own review, or ask your satisfied >> customers to do the same. This is much more powerful from a business >> point of view than legal threa >> >> No idea if this helps; it may at least round out the picture. >> > > Tom, > > Certainly clarifies a lot. > > Naturally, I do expect other Review services that are Linked Data based to > emerge soon. Yes, this is inevitable IMHO. > I am certainly trying to encourage all "Review" services I > encounter to make this shift --- as you may have noticed via some of my > Tweets [1] :-) Thanks for all the publicity along the way ;) Tom. >> 2009/3/5 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>: >> >>> >>> John Goodwin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I've decided to (for the time being at least) remove the pubs linked >>>> data. >>>> Someone seemed to object to a review of their local (see here >>>> http://tinyurl.com/d36s4c) and having looked at some of the other (more >>>> negative reviews) I decided I didn't want this happening again. >>>> >>>> While I didn't do the data capture or reviews the pubs were hosted on my >>>> website - and someone did find contact details and get in touch :( The >>>> reviews were all meant in fun, but some could be (and have been) taken >>>> the >>>> wrong way. So I'd sooner not risk getting sued or having my knee caps >>>> removed by angry locals! >>>> On the plus side it was a useful exercise for me...setting up some >>>> linked >>>> data. Maybe I'll put it back at some stage without the reviews. Remember >>>> in >>>> the words of the mighty Joe Strummer "You have the right to free speech >>>> as >>>> long as you're not dumb enough to actually try it" :) >>>> John >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and >>>> may >>>> contain confidential information. If you have received this email in >>>> error, >>>> please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied, >>>> distributed or disclosed to any other person. >>>> >>>> Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the >>>> writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor >>>> can >>>> any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve >>>> the >>>> right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice. >>>> >>>> Thank you for your cooperation. >>>> >>>> Ordnance Survey >>>> Romsey Road >>>> Southampton SO16 4GU >>>> Tel: 08456 050505 >>>> http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> John, >>> >>> So does Tom get into trouble if I give a Pub a bad review using >>> <http://revyu.com> ? >>> I still think you inadvertently stumbled on a business model here :-) >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >>> President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >>> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >>> >>> Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com >>> shared innovationTM >>> >>> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be >>> those >>> of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email >>> message >>> and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of >>> the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then >>> please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this >>> e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited. >>> >>> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is >>> registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights >>> Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB. >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. >>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com > shared innovationTM > > Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those > of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message > and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of > the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then > please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this > e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited. > > Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is > registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights > Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Dr Tom Heath Researcher Platform Division Talis Information Ltd T: 0870 400 5000 W: http://www.talis.com/
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 15:09:00 UTC