- From: Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:57:52 -0700
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
- Cc: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>, public-lod@w3.org
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 12:37 +0100, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: > Le 18/06/2009 16:46, Alexandre Passant a écrit : > > I just reply to an e-mail from Toby on the topic on the commontag ml. > > Since the archives are not yet public, let-me repost my point about the > > mappings here. > > > > "A Tag in common tag is a tag a seen in Newman's ontology. > > My understanding of Newman's ontology is that the URI tag:cheese (for > example) represent every occurence of the string "cheese" used as a tag. > > This cannot work with common tag, since "cheese" can be used: > - on resource R1 at date D1 as an AuthorTag > - on resource R2 at date D2 as a ReaderTag > > This practically forces us to define two distinct Tag resources, both > with the label "cheese", but with different types and taggingDate. > > Of course, nothing prevents us from using the same resource, but in that > case, we would not know anymore which date and which tag type correspond > to which resource... > > So the design of Common Tag implies that Tag resources should not be > "reused" across different tagging actions, which IMHO makes them quite > different from Newman's Tags (and close to Tagging, in fact). Yes, exactly, that is the case. > pa > -- Andraz Tori, CTO Zemanta Ltd, New York, London, Ljubljana www.zemanta.com mail: andraz@zemanta.com tel: +386 41 515 767 twitter: andraz, skype: minmax_test
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:03:55 UTC