- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:01:23 +1000
- To: "Damian Steer" <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 01:02:00 UTC
2008/11/23 Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk> > > On 22 Nov 2008, at 22:06, Peter Ansell wrote: > >> >> On the point of licensing... Why do more data sets not include links to >> the >> relevant copyright statements and/or licenses with cc:license [1] , >> dc:license etc.? >> > > Creative commons often isn't appropriate in this area, since what we a > talking about are collections of facts. The creative element is not in the > content but the collection and arrangement of the facts, and the notion of > 'ownership' is captured in database rights, rather than copyright. Happily > Talis and others been looking at this area: > > <http://www.opendatacommons.org/> > > and particularly: > > <http://www.opendatacommons.org/odc-public-domain-dedication-and-licence/> > > The difference goes completely over my head. Maybe I shouldn't delve into it without expert help. Cheers, Peter
Received on Sunday, 23 November 2008 01:02:00 UTC