- From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:58:10 +0200
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: "Keith Alexander" <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Hello, On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:40:12 Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > [...] > provenance is indeed in scope (as it says it on the Wiki, but too hidden, I > guess): > > ' + using scovo to attach statistics (such as number of instances of a > certain class, etc.) and extend with dc:provenance for scovo:Item' > > so, the basic idea IIRC is to extend scovo (which is under our control > as well ;) to hold the provenance information. I was aware of this point. However, I interpreted it as follows. Statistical information about the dataset is represented by scovo:Item instances. Those statistic items will get a dc:provenance property which represents the provenance of the statistic item (e.g. methods with which the statistics have been generated). I am proposing, in contrast, a possibility to represent the provenance of the data in the dataset. Regards, Ole
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 13:59:05 UTC