- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:17:55 +0200
- To: "Olaf Hartig" <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Cc: "Keith Alexander" <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Olaf, Thanks! Got it now ;) Would you mind adding this as a proposal to the Wiki [1], please? Cheers, Michael [1] http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Extensions_a nd_feature_requests ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Olaf Hartig [mailto:hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:58 PM >To: Hausenblas, Michael >Cc: Keith Alexander; public-lod@w3.org >Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of >interlinked datasets > >Hello, > >On Wednesday 11 June 2008 14:40:12 Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> [...] >> provenance is indeed in scope (as it says it on the Wiki, >but too hidden, I >> guess): >> >> ' + using scovo to attach statistics (such as number of >instances of a >> certain class, etc.) and extend with dc:provenance for scovo:Item' >> >> so, the basic idea IIRC is to extend scovo (which is under >our control >> as well ;) to hold the provenance information. > >I was aware of this point. However, I interpreted it as >follows. Statistical >information about the dataset is represented by scovo:Item >instances. Those >statistic items will get a dc:provenance property which represents the >provenance of the statistic item (e.g. methods with which the >statistics have >been generated). >I am proposing, in contrast, a possibility to represent the >provenance of the >data in the dataset. > >Regards, >Ole >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 14:22:23 UTC