- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:40:12 +0200
- To: "Keith Alexander" <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, "Olaf Hartig" <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
- Cc: <public-lod@w3.org>
Olaf, Just one tiny addition to Keith - provenance is indeed in scope (as it says it on the Wiki, but too hidden, I guess): ' + using scovo to attach statistics (such as number of instances of a certain class, etc.) and extend with dc:provenance for scovo:Item' so, the basic idea IIRC is to extend scovo (which is under our control as well ;) to hold the provenance information. Thanks for your feedback! Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: Keith Alexander [mailto:k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:07 PM >To: Olaf Hartig; Hausenblas, Michael; public-lod@w3.org >Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD - vocabulary of >interlinked datasets > > >> you think additional provenance information is beyond the scope of voiD? >> > >Hi, > >Our aim is that existing vocabularies like DC be used where >possible, and the primer Michael mentioned will hopefully give advice on >which existing terms are most appropriate to use with the voiD vocabulary. In >this case, perhaps ?dataset foaf:maker ?agent ? > >Cheers, > > >Keith > >-- >-- >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:47:23 UTC