RE: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

Could Richard maybe specify what this international consensus is? I see that I need to pay CHF 58 to read the document…

 

Makx.

 

 

From: richard.murcott@gmail.com [mailto:richard.murcott@gmail.com] 
Sent: 24 September 2015 11:03
To: Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com>
Cc: public-locadd@w3.org
Subject: Re: Distinguishing between types of address (locn)

 

I don't know what "Core Location Vocabulary" is. 

 

However,  

New Zealand has been paying close attention to the development of ISO 19160-1:2015 <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61710>  ( my understanding is that this is already at Stage 60..00 - International Standard under publication ).

The standard provides an international consensus on a model/approach to 'distinguish between different types of address'. An innovation of the standard is to cater the specification of classes of address. 

New Zealand, like other jurisdictions participating in ISO/TC211 <http://www.isotc211.org> , is creating a conforming Profile of this new standard to articulate NZ's address characteristics. 

 

Richard




Richard Murcott   |   M +64 27 2243 041

 

On 24 September 2015 at 01:26, Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com <mailto:pano.maria@taxonic.com> > wrote:

Hi all,

 

I have a question that I’m struggling with. How can I distinguish between different types of addresses?

Say a person has a home address and a postal address that are distinct. Same could go for a company

That has a postal address and a registration address..

Is there a standard or agreed upon way to express this using the Core Location Vocabulary?

Thanks in advance!

 

Kind regards,

Pano