- From: <richard.murcott@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:02:40 +1200
- To: Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com>
- Cc: "public-locadd@w3.org" <public-locadd@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL_C5zFvgqWNJp_pQrbdny6EEuZ8ZkQmsbf1iw7Z4qiYnpfRDA@mail.gmail.com>
I don't know what "Core Location Vocabulary" is. However, New Zealand has been paying close attention to the development of ISO 19160-1:2015 <http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61710> ( my understanding is that this is already at Stage 60.00 - International Standard under publication ). The standard provides an international consensus on a model/approach to 'distinguish between different types of address'. An innovation of the standard is to cater the specification of classes of address. New Zealand, like other jurisdictions participating in ISO/TC211 <http://www.isotc211.org>, is creating a conforming Profile of this new standard to articulate NZ's address characteristics. Richard Richard Murcott | M +64 27 2243 041 On 24 September 2015 at 01:26, Pano Maria <pano.maria@taxonic.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I have a question that I’m struggling with. How can I distinguish between > different types of addresses? > > Say a person has a home address and a postal address that are distinct. > Same could go for a company > > That has a postal address and a registration address. > > Is there a standard or agreed upon way to express this using the Core > Location Vocabulary? > > Thanks in advance! > > > > Kind regards, > > Pano >
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 16:22:26 UTC