- From: Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:57:34 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Sven Schade <sven.schade@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, <public-locadd@w3.org>
Hi Raphäel/Sven, I agree with that idea and I would be happy to contribute this use case. In fact I was providing this use case only because there was an e-mail in the thread asking for use cases, not because I considered that the model did not fulfill the requirements for the use case. Oscar -- Oscar Corcho Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 Fax (+34) 91 352 48 19 El 18/01/14 12:16, "Raphaël Troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> escribió: >Hello, > >> Sure. But this can already be presented with the current model. > >Perhaps what is missing at the moment is a sort of primer that describes >a few of these use cases and show how the current locn vocabulary could >be used to model those needs. Beyond the formal definition of the >vocabulary classes and properties in the ontology, I observe that >adopters of vocabulary often like to refer to concrete example and adapt >afterwards to their needs. Should we start to produce concrete examples >with the vocabulary, for example on the wiki? > > Raphaël > >-- >Raphaël Troncy >EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech >Multimedia Communications Department >450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. >e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com >Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 >Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 >Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ >
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 11:58:09 UTC