Re: Sub-properties for locn:geometry?

Hello,

> Sure. But this can already be presented with the current model.

Perhaps what is missing at the moment is a sort of primer that describes 
a few of these use cases and show how the current locn vocabulary could 
be used to model those needs. Beyond the formal definition of the 
vocabulary classes and properties in the ontology, I observe that 
adopters of vocabulary often like to refer to concrete example and adapt 
afterwards to their needs. Should we start to produce concrete examples 
with the vocabulary, for example on the wiki?

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/

Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 11:17:03 UTC