- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@isoco.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:32:38 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- CC: Sven Schade <sven.schade@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, 'Oscar Corcho' <ocorcho@fi.upm.es>, Simon.Cox@csiro.au, frans.knibbe@geodan.nl, public-locadd@w3.org
On 18/01/2014 12:16, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Hello, > >> Sure. But this can already be presented with the current model. > > Perhaps what is missing at the moment is a sort of primer that > describes a few of these use cases and show how the current locn > vocabulary could be used to model those needs. Beyond the formal > definition of the vocabulary classes and properties in the ontology, I > observe that adopters of vocabulary often like to refer to concrete > example and adapt afterwards to their needs. Should we start to > produce concrete examples with the vocabulary, for example on the wiki? I think it's a very good idea. There is a lot of discussion in this group, which is great!, but I think we should start writing down some notes on the wiki. I think we can reorganize our UsesCases page (1), or even create a new one. Boris (1) http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/Use_cases > > Raphaël >
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2014 22:33:15 UTC