- From: Lukas Koster <l.koster@uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:54:31 +0200
- To: public-lld@w3.org
Antoine thanks, that's helpful :-) And yes, I appreciate that the topic is quite complex. I am fully aware of that. This is why I am asking all these stupid questions, and why I'm trying to simplify things ;-) Lukas On 28-4-2011 10:23, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > >>> Interesting subject. I agree with Ed that organisations should try >>> and use existing vocabularies & ontologies (by the way, can someone >>> explain the difference if there is any? thanks) first. >> >> Vocabularies is used both for value vocabularies (the right-hand >> "object" side of the triple) and for ontologies (the middle >> "predicate"), so it is confusing. I try to say "value vocabularies" >> for the former, but it's convenient to use "vocabularies" when you >> mean both, thus continuing the general confusion :-) > > > > In fact there's even a small piece of text which elaborates on our > choices: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Library_terminology_informally_explained#Definitions > > Please bear with us, the topic is quite complex, and we had to make some > choices... > > Cheers, > > Antoine >
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 14:55:01 UTC