Re: Recommendations: URIs

Lukas, this is great. There's one thing I would add:

> - Libraries should assign URIs for relations between their things  
> (these URIs identify "ontology" or "vocabulary" data: thing 'book'  
> relation 'written by' thing 'person')

-> Libraries should assign URIs for relations between their things,  
and between their things and other things in LD space

kc

Quoting Lukas Koster <l.koster@uva.nl>:

> I'm not sure who said what anymore ;-)
>
> Let me try to give a very simple summary (for my own understanding).  
> And I'm simplifying enormously!
>
> - Libraries should assign URIs to their own things (these URIs  
> identify "instance data", in any case books; but also authors and  
> subjects)
> - These things can be described elsewhere (with global URI) or  
> locally (with local URI)
> - Libraries should assign URIs for relations between their things  
> (these URIs identify "ontology" or "vocabulary" data: thing 'book'  
> relation 'written by' thing 'person')
> - These relations should be described elsewhere, as part of an  
> ontology or vocabulary
>
> That's it, isn't it?
>
> Lukas Koster
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 15:21:41 UTC