- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 08:48:09 -0700
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: public-lld@w3.org
Quoting Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: > We could continue to discuss this on public-lld; it is very > relevant to the topic "library linked data"! We can also flag > it as an issue (and possible candidate for follow-up actions) > in the LLD Incubator Group. However in my view, detailed > technical discussion should be out of scope for the Incubator > Group per se. Since this is relevant to more than libraries, > this would be a great issue to raise on the Pedantic Web list > [1]. This is an issue that comes out also in our topic list. [1] There are numerous aspects of LD that are not yet fully resolved, but that logically exist outside of the more specific question of LLD. We cannot resolve these within the LLD activity. Instead, we may need to develop "work-arounds" in order to move library data forward, knowing that our first attempts may need to be revised at a later date. To that end, being aware of those unresolved issues, and making the most informed choices based on that, are key to our (the library world's) success. It seems to me that the most important activities in the LLD area today are ones that are "pre-LD" -- that is, the attempts to formally define the domain models and vocabularies in a way that will be compatible with LD. To this end, it might be good to take a closer look at some of those structures from an LD point of view. I have been glancing at the registered version of FRAD [2] and have some concerns and questions. The biggest question in my mind at the moment, however, is: what is the mechanism to bring LD principles into the modeling activities that are taking place? Can we "incubate" at that pre-LD activity point? kc [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics#Semantic_Web_Environmental_Issues [2]http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/24.html -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 15:48:43 UTC