- From: Martin Malmsten <Martin.Malmsten@kb.se>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:31:38 +0200
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>
Jeff, I understand, but would not putting a $0 in the 1XX accomplish just that since the 1XX identifies what the record is "about"? I'm just saying that by using $0 you could link to other things (or Things) from other parts of the record as well. However, we do actually use 856 with a $z in our production environment today. It works, but I do not like the amount of implicit information with this (or rather our version of this) solution. Example: 100 '1' ' ' $aStrindberg, August, $d1849-1912 856 '4' '8' $uhttp://viaf.org/viaf/54154627 $zVIAF /martin On Oct 1, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote: > Martin, > > I think our use cases are getting mixed up. I want a place to identify the thing the Authority record (as a whole) represents. Linking to *other* things inside a MARC record is a harder and more controversial problem as Michael's response indicates. I'm hoping this is low-hanging fruit, but I admit the difference is subtle. > > Jeff > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin Malmsten [mailto:Martin.Malmsten@kb.se] >> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:36 PM >> To: Young,Jeff (OR) >> Cc: public-lld@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Linked Data URIs in MARC Authorities >> >> Jeff, Karen. >> >> I prefer a subfield over a field because may I want to link only parts >> of the record, and not necessarily the 1XX-field, to another resource >> without having to resort to a $8-link (*shudder*). >> >> Example: >> 150 ' ' ' ' $aMödrar >> 750 ' ' '0' $aMothers $0 >> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85087526#concept >> >> /martin >> >> On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote: >> >>> How about this: >>> >>> 856 4# $u http://example.org/foo >>> >>> Here's the documentation for the field: >>> >>> http://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad856.html >>> http://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> From: Martin Malmsten [mailto:Martin.Malmsten@kb.se] >>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:26 PM >>> To: Young,Jeff (OR) >>> Cc: public-lld@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: Linked Data URIs in MARC Authorities >>> >>> I'm considering/testing $0 in the 1XX fields, analogues to $0 in the >> bib record. The idea is that a DbPedia/Freebase/VIAF URI could >> authorise an authority record. "Global headings change" becomes a fun >> challenge with LD URIs within the record :) >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 1 okt 2010, at 18:00, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: >>> >>> If somebody wanted to put a Linked Data RWO URI in a MARC Authority >> record, where would it plausibly go? >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> --- >>> Jeffrey A. Young >>> Software Architect >>> OCLC Research, Mail Code 410 >>> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. >>> 6565 Kilgour Place >>> Dublin, OH 43017-3395 >>> www.oclc.org >>> >>> Voice: 614-764-4342 >>> Voice: 800-848-5878, ext. 4342 >>> Fax: 614-718-7477 >>> Email: jyoung@oclc.org >>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- >> Martin Malmsten (martin.malmsten@kb.se) - Senior Developer >> National Library of Sweden / National cooperation dept. / LIBRIS >> http://libris.kb.se >> >> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Malmsten (martin.malmsten@kb.se) - Senior Developer National Library of Sweden / National cooperation dept. / LIBRIS http://libris.kb.se
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 19:32:35 UTC