- From: Martin Malmsten <Martin.Malmsten@kb.se>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:35:55 +0200
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>
Jeff, Karen. I prefer a subfield over a field because may I want to link only parts of the record, and not necessarily the 1XX-field, to another resource without having to resort to a $8-link (*shudder*). Example: 150 ' ' ' ' $aMödrar 750 ' ' '0' $aMothers $0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85087526#concept /martin On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote: > How about this: > > 856 4# $u http://example.org/foo > > Here’s the documentation for the field: > > http://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad856.html > http://www.loc.gov/marc/856guide.html > > Jeff > > From: Martin Malmsten [mailto:Martin.Malmsten@kb.se] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:26 PM > To: Young,Jeff (OR) > Cc: public-lld@w3.org > Subject: Re: Linked Data URIs in MARC Authorities > > I'm considering/testing $0 in the 1XX fields, analogues to $0 in the bib record. The idea is that a DbPedia/Freebase/VIAF URI could authorise an authority record. "Global headings change" becomes a fun challenge with LD URIs within the record :) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 1 okt 2010, at 18:00, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > > If somebody wanted to put a Linked Data RWO URI in a MARC Authority record, where would it plausibly go? > > Jeff > > --- > Jeffrey A. Young > Software Architect > OCLC Research, Mail Code 410 > OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. > 6565 Kilgour Place > Dublin, OH 43017-3395 > www.oclc.org > > Voice: 614-764-4342 > Voice: 800-848-5878, ext. 4342 > Fax: 614-718-7477 > Email: jyoung@oclc.org > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Malmsten (martin.malmsten@kb.se) - Senior Developer National Library of Sweden / National cooperation dept. / LIBRIS http://libris.kb.se
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 18:51:26 UTC