- From: Haffner, Alexander <A.Haffner@d-nb.de>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:33:57 +0100
- To: "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>
Hi Mark, Good point! > About terminology: > > I understand that FOAF, FRAD, ... are called "vocabularies" by this > group (although I would term them "schemas" or "metadata schemas"). I like also the RDA, FRBRer etc. terminology "element sets" > But what are AAT, LCSH, ... called, if not "vocabularies" (at least I > hope a separate term is reserved for terminological resources). Here I prefer the term "value vocabularies" because they usually act as values for "elements" Cheers, Alexander > Mark > > On 29/10/2010 16:38, Karen Coyle wrote: > > sorry about that prior glitch. I have started the terminology page for > > semantic web terms: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Semantic_Web_terminology > > > > and did one entry as an example. I will work on it as I have time, but > > please step in and add what you can. Remember, this is to be > > explanations for novices, not formal definitions, so please be > > user-friendly. > > > > kc > > > > -- > Mark van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 14:34:32 UTC