Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community

Agree

<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> Wrote
>
>>
>
> This is precisely an issue I raised earlier on. I was involved in  
> two XGs
> (MMSEM and RDB2RDF) and from that experience I can tell: there  
> should only
> be one list and this one should be public.
>
> Cheers,
>      Michael
>
>
>
>> From: Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:07:54 -0400
>> To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
>> Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>, team-xg-activity <team-xg-activity@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community
>> Resent-From: <public-lld@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:08:29 +0000
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You may unsubscribe (and subscribe) to the public-lld@w3.org list
>>> Public-lld@w3.org is a public list, just like public-xg-lld@w3.org  
>>> which
>>> now serves for participants of the LLD Incubator Group.
>>
>> They're not really just like each other since one apparently now has
>> restricted membership.  Other incubator groups like Provenance and
>> Social seem to manage operate successfully without restricting access
>> to their "public" lists.  Is there a reason that LLD can't do the
>> same?
>>
>> If there are going to be two lists, one public and one restricted,  
>> the
>> important thing is how the information flow is partitioned between  
>> the
>> two lists.  Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
>> Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both
>> lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the archives and do
>> the cross-posting?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 17:22:06 UTC