AW: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community

+1, Joachim 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-lld-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Hausenblas
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2010 19:13
> An: Tom Morris; Coralie Mercier
> Cc: public-lld@w3.org; team-xg-activity
> Betreff: Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community
> 
> 
> > They're not really just like each other since one 
> apparently now has 
> > restricted membership.  Other incubator groups like Provenance and 
> > Social seem to manage operate successfully without 
> restricting access 
> > to their "public" lists.  Is there a reason that LLD can't do the 
> > same?
> > 
> > If there are going to be two lists, one public and one 
> restricted, the 
> > important thing is how the information flow is partitioned 
> between the 
> > two lists.  Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
> > Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both 
> > lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the 
> archives and do 
> > the cross-posting?
> 
> This is precisely an issue I raised earlier on. I was 
> involved in two XGs (MMSEM and RDB2RDF) and from that 
> experience I can tell: there should only be one list and this 
> one should be public.
> 
> Cheers,
>       Michael
> 
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National 
> University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 
> 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:07:54 -0400
> > To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
> > Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>, team-xg-activity <team-xg-activity@w3.org>
> > Subject: Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG 
> community
> > Resent-From: <public-lld@w3.org>
> > Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:08:29 +0000
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Coralie Mercier 
> <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> You may unsubscribe (and subscribe) to the public-lld@w3.org list
> >> Public-lld@w3.org is a public list, just like 
> public-xg-lld@w3.org which
> >> now serves for participants of the LLD Incubator Group.
> > 
> > They're not really just like each other since one apparently now has
> > restricted membership.  Other incubator groups like Provenance and
> > Social seem to manage operate successfully without 
> restricting access
> > to their "public" lists.  Is there a reason that LLD can't do the
> > same?
> > 
> > If there are going to be two lists, one public and one 
> restricted, the
> > important thing is how the information flow is partitioned 
> between the
> > two lists.  Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
> > Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both
> > lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the 
> archives and do
> > the cross-posting?
> > 
> > Tom
> > 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 17:15:00 UTC