Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community

> They're not really just like each other since one apparently now has
> restricted membership.  Other incubator groups like Provenance and
> Social seem to manage operate successfully without restricting access
> to their "public" lists.  Is there a reason that LLD can't do the
> same?
> 
> If there are going to be two lists, one public and one restricted, the
> important thing is how the information flow is partitioned between the
> two lists.  Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
> Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both
> lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the archives and do
> the cross-posting?

This is precisely an issue I raised earlier on. I was involved in two XGs
(MMSEM and RDB2RDF) and from that experience I can tell: there should only
be one list and this one should be public.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:07:54 -0400
> To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
> Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>, team-xg-activity <team-xg-activity@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Mailing list maintenance and change for LLD XG community
> Resent-From: <public-lld@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:08:29 +0000
> 
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> You may unsubscribe (and subscribe) to the public-lld@w3.org list
>> Public-lld@w3.org is a public list, just like public-xg-lld@w3.org which
>> now serves for participants of the LLD Incubator Group.
> 
> They're not really just like each other since one apparently now has
> restricted membership.  Other incubator groups like Provenance and
> Social seem to manage operate successfully without restricting access
> to their "public" lists.  Is there a reason that LLD can't do the
> same?
> 
> If there are going to be two lists, one public and one restricted, the
> important thing is how the information flow is partitioned between the
> two lists.  Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
> Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both
> lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the archives and do
> the cross-posting?
> 
> Tom
>

Received on Thursday, 3 June 2010 17:13:18 UTC