- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:09:48 -0700
- To: public-lld@w3.org
There's been something tickling my brain for a bit, so I sat down to try to draw up a diagram. Essentially, the question is: what is the domain & range of an RDA property? Then I began to wonder what is the domain and range of a property based on RDA but not bound to a FRBR domain? My unfinished diagram is here: kcoyle.net/domainsranges.pdf and I now realize that title isn't the best example to use. But the key element, in my mind, is that the RDA guidance rules both guide the metadata creator and define the range of the element. Those ranges are inherent in the rules but have not been extracted into the registry, in part because many of the ranges are quite complex. In the rules you find how the property is to be structured and what values are valid, which to me is the definition of the range. Note that in the diagram I have only filled in the domain and range at the bottom (most specific) level. That is because I'm not sure what to do beyond that. If we treat the RDA rules as describing the ranges for the properties, then all of the properties, regardless of whether they are bound to FRBR, are very tightly defined (probably what Tom would call ontologically strict). If we wish for other communities to provide guidance rules of their own for the properties, then it becomes hard to think of them as RDA properties. (This is a can of worms that has been a matter of discussion between JSC and the registry.) What I am getting at is that we may need a hierarchy that goes like this (from most specific to most general): 1. RDA + FRBR -- range is as defined in RDA; domain is FRBR entity 2. RDA alone -- range is as defined in RDA; no domain? 3. Property with definition -- range and domain are open I hope I've made some sense here. Although we've discussed whether RDA properties must be bound to FRBR, in fact I think that RDA's definition of the values/ranges is more of a constraint than FRBR. kc p.s. I will try to locate some better examples of RDA rules as ranges. -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 00:10:22 UTC