W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: RDA and ranges - take 2

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:03:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20100818100323.36pcadqoqo0o0ww4@kcoyle.net>
To: public-lld@w3.org


>
> What I am getting at is that we may need a hierarchy that goes like
> this (from most specific to most general):
>
> 1. RDA + FRBR -- range is as defined in RDA; domain is FRBR entity
> 2. RDA alone -- range is as defined in RDA; no domain?
> 3. Property with definition -- range and domain are open
>

I've re-done the diagram using Extent, which I think better  
illustrates the issue:

http://kcoyle.net/domainsrangesExtent.pdf

What is doesn't cover is a 4th possibility:

4. Property with definition + FRBR

This might be useful in creating a FRBR-zed version of MARC (but maybe  
not) -- but in any case it is a logical extension of all of this.

kc


-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2010 17:03:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:57 UTC