W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Property nesting/transparent properties

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:06:33 -0800
To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4718678B-EF83-413A-A92E-B7B789A5A506@greggkellogg.net>
After active discussion, I’ve completed the PR for this feature. There was some discussion about replacing “@nest” with another keyword, but it collected the most votes. The group can always choose to revisit this in the future.

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
> As an alternative to PR #451 [1], PR #453 [2] uses @nest as a property of a term definition, rather than a type of @container value. This was suggested by Niklas Lindström in a comment to issue #246 [3] and has the distinction of allowing both nesting, and language/index containers simultaneously at the expense of adding a new compaction concept.
> 
> Please weigh in on the issue or either PR with any opinions, or reply to this thread.
> 
> Formatted versions, with cumulative change highlighting, available through RawGit [4][5].
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/451
> [2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/453
> [3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/246#issuecomment-271519738
> [4] https://rawgit.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issue-246-nesting2/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html
> [5] https://rawgit.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issue-246-nesting2/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html
> 
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 03:07:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:49 UTC