Re: Property nesting/transparent properties from Gregg Kellogg on 2017-01-12 (public-linked-json@w3.org from January 2017)

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:57:17 -0800
To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1B4C1DA9-0275-443D-A028-86B47B2E4F3E@greggkellogg.net>

As an alternative to PR #451 [1], PR #453 [2] uses @nest as a property of a term definition, rather than a type of @container value. This was suggested by Niklas Lindström in a comment to issue #246 [3] and has the distinction of allowing both nesting, and language/index containers simultaneously at the expense of adding a new compaction concept.

Please weigh in on the issue or either PR with any opinions, or reply to this thread.

Formatted versions, with cumulative change highlighting, available through RawGit [4][5].

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

[1] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/451
[2] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/453
[3] https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/246#issuecomment-271519738
[4] https://rawgit.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issue-246-nesting2/spec/latest/json-ld/index.html
[5] https://rawgit.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issue-246-nesting2/spec/latest/json-ld-api/index.html

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2017 22:57:52 UTC