W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Schema.org just published a JSON-LD context

From: vikash agrawal <vikashagrawal1990@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:23:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKpG3NhJxpfv5Mre4M13QOzRD_M-jRpBZqpcfDmZCqggWu54hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Cheers everyone :)

Regards
~Vikash

On 6/17/14, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan, all,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>
>> On 17 June 2014 13:02, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>> > On 6/16/14 5:48 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> Today is another important milestone for JSON-LD as Schema.org just
>> >> published a first version of their context. See yourself:
>> >>
>> >>     curlhttp://schema.org   -H "Accept: application/ld+json"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Dan!
>>
>
> Great news indeed; thanks!
>
>
>>  >> Cheers,
>> >> Markus
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> P.S. Those of you who don't have curl installed can have a look at the
>> >> context here:
>> >>    http://schema.org/docs/jsonldcontext.json.txt
>> >
>> > Markus,
>> >
>> > Do you have a live example?
>> >
>> > Assuming I am trying to de-reference the correct HTTP URIs, here my
>> experience[...]
>>
>> This is for the schema.org @context file, whose IRIURIURL is
>> http://schema.org/
>>
>> We're content negotiating that because JSON-LD tools expect to find it
>> via the @context URL, and we wanted the simplest possible URL for
>> schema.org in JSON-LD.
>>
>> At this point there's no per-term content negotiation on the
>> type/property/enum pages. You will however find small amounts of RDFa
>> now in the per-term pages, and a handful of mappings to external
>> mappings. See for example http://schema.org/Dataset
>>
>
> Also wonderful news!
>
> (This should pave the way for accepting dataset descriptions using
> schema.org terms where data catalog systems currently look for DCAT
> specifically (since they can "follow their noses" to the equivalency). This
> has come up in relation to some library work recently, so it's nice
> timing!)
>
> There is a small error in the RDFa though – it uses CURIEs within plain
> @href attributes. Only RDFa specific attributes support prefix expansion.
> (Just filed a pull request to fix this [1].)
>
> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
> [1]: https://github.com/rvguha/schemaorg/pull/47
>
>
> cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 13:54:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:41 UTC