W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2013

Re: API edits to avoid implying that JSON-LD is not RDF

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:59:40 -0400
Message-ID: <51F988CC.1050001@dbooth.org>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: 'Melvin Carvalho' <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, 'Linked JSON' <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 07/31/2013 03:24 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:03 PM, David Booth wrote:
>> On 07/30/2013 12:40 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>>> The other comments can be found directly in the PR at
>>>     https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/287/files
>>> I think it's easier to discuss them (in the proper context) there.
>> I've gone through them and agree with most.
> Thanks. I've updated the pull request to incorporate those tweaks. You can
> see the changes compare to the current API spec here:
>    https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/pull/287/files
> Melvin, I cc'ed you because I would like to kindly ask you to have a quick
> look at those changes since you initially disagreed with David's proposals.
> The diff of the tweaks I've just made based on our discussion is here:
> https://github.com/lanthaler/json-ld.org/commit/686ae53dee26d7c2433753739eef
> cf0b7d1721ff
> I'm going to merge those changes into the API spec in in 24-36 hours unless
> I hear objections.
> David, do you have any other concerns regarding the API spec?

Not that I've seen so far.   I think it looks pretty good.

I was wondering a bit about adding support for lists-of-lists, but since 
I don't have the time to do the work that would be required to add that 
feature, I'm not going to complain about its absence.  :)  But if 
someone else did, I would certainly applaud.

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 22:00:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:38 UTC