RE: JSON-LD - RDF alignment editorial issues

On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 8:28 PM, David Booth wrote:
> s/JSON-LD to RDF converters/JSON-LD processors/

This is problematic because it would combine two separate product classes
into one. What about changing it to "JSON-LD as RDF interpreters"?

> =================================================
> In the APIs document there are too many small edits needed to
> productively list them all here.  I think it would be much more
> efficient if the editors could point me to the original source document
> so that I can directly edit a copy of that.  The editors can then view
> a diff and accept or reject the edits that I propose.
> Could the editors please point me to the original API source document?
> I only see the HTML-rendered version when I access

Markus Lanthaler

Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 18:56:53 UTC