Re: JSON-LD - RDF alignment editorial issues

On 07/09/2013 02:56 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 8:28 PM, David Booth wrote:
>> s/JSON-LD to RDF converters/JSON-LD processors/
> This is problematic because it would combine two separate product classes
> into one. What about changing it to "JSON-LD as RDF interpreters"?

Sure, that's fine, but probably best to hyphenate: "JSON-LD-as-RDF 
interpreters".  Or maybe "RDF interpretation of JSON-LD" would be clearer.


Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2013 20:30:54 UTC