- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:31:19 +0200
- To: "'Linked JSON'" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On Monday, August 12, 2013 12:15 PM, vikash agrawal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> Thanks for your update Vikash, >> >> a few comments/questions: >> - how complete is the schema.org context? It looks quite small, >> are those really all terms? Is it generated automatically or manually? > > I think its more or or less complete in my opinion. It does look small > but has a decent number for fields comparing People, Places and Events > and @vocab. So you are saying it is complete for these three types. What about all the rest? I'm not sure what we should do here but since you also set up that w3id redirect and called it just "schema" I think it should be complete, i.e., cover schema.org completely. For example, a quick check revealed that "discussionUrl" from http://schema.org/Review is missing. > So upon expansion we would have quiet a number of fields that can used > in sync to the creator app. As said above, the question is what this context will be used for. Cheers, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 10:31:54 UTC