Re: Weekly Updates

hi Markus,

Earlier over IRC Manu and Gregg told me once that for now it can be a basic
one. but if you say so, I will love to add various other terms as well :)
It will surely a great learning :)

Also for the schema, Manu over irc told me that it should be this way only
but if you and other community members think is the
right way, then I will go ahead and do that :)

To my understanding, this context in the current state will be used just in
the creator app as IIRC it was told that in future will publish
there own contexts. But expanding it to a more holistic will be a good fun

I think some things that you think is not concrete at the moment might be
because of the GSoC deadline, which has to be met for my final evaluation.
But IMHO, to me that is surely not my end goal as I am looking forward to
more than that :)


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Markus Lanthaler

> On Monday, August 12, 2013 12:15 PM, vikash agrawal wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> >> Thanks for your update Vikash,
> >>
> >> a few comments/questions:
> >> - how complete is the context? It looks quite small,
> >> are those really all terms? Is it generated automatically or manually?
> >
> > I think its more or or less complete in my opinion. It does look small
> > but has a decent number for fields comparing People, Places and Events
> > and @vocab.
> So you are saying it is complete for these three types. What about all the
> rest? I'm not sure what we should do here but since you also set up that
> w3id redirect and called it just "schema" I think it should be complete,
> i.e., cover completely. For example, a quick check revealed
> that "discussionUrl" from is missing.
> > So upon expansion we would have quiet a number of fields that can used
> > in sync to the creator app.
> As said above, the question is what this context will be used for.
> Cheers,
> Markus
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 10:58:29 UTC