- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:25:29 -0500
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
I spent the day today thoroughly vetting and updating the JSON-LD Syntax specification to reflect the latest thinking by this community group on the JSON-LD markup language. The following actions were taken as a result: * Completely de-coupled the JSON-LD Syntax document from the JSON-LD API and normalization documents. * Thorough check on all spelling, grammar and links. * Terminology changes * Web Vocabulary -> vocabulary * literal -> value * datatype -> type * plain literal -> string value * typed literal -> typed value * chaining -> embedding * More detailed explanation of some of the JSON-LD concepts. * Minor technical corrections to match teleconference/mailing list discussions * Processed all 45 closed bugs and ensured that there were links to a timestamped specification section demonstrating that the resolutions were not only adopted by the group, but they resulted in a specification change. The latest time-stamped specification can be found here: http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/ A diff-marked copy from the previous version can be found here: http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/diff-20120112.html This is the type of editorial review we go through before heading into Last Call at W3C... so, the document is in /very/ good shape. The only glaring issues that remain are the ones surrounding @list: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/44 https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/52 https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/60 We're very, very close to feature freeze for the JSON-LD Syntax. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Sunday, 22 January 2012 21:25:58 UTC