- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:38:38 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <72C11D1A-489D-41FE-8D81-93533267627E@w3.org>
Manu, I know I sound like a broken record. But the { "@id" : [ { ... } { ... } ] } idiom is still not defined anywhere and it just pops up from nowhere in section A.2. I do not believe that the syntax and semantics in that example can be derived from any of the previous sections. Ivan On Jan 22, 2012, at 22:25 , Manu Sporny wrote: > I spent the day today thoroughly vetting and updating the JSON-LD Syntax > specification to reflect the latest thinking by this community group on > the JSON-LD markup language. > > The following actions were taken as a result: > > * Completely de-coupled the JSON-LD Syntax document from the JSON-LD > API and normalization documents. > * Thorough check on all spelling, grammar and links. > * Terminology changes > * Web Vocabulary -> vocabulary > * literal -> value > * datatype -> type > * plain literal -> string value > * typed literal -> typed value > * chaining -> embedding > * More detailed explanation of some of the JSON-LD concepts. > * Minor technical corrections to match teleconference/mailing list > discussions > * Processed all 45 closed bugs and ensured that there were links to a > timestamped specification section demonstrating that the resolutions > were not only adopted by the group, but they resulted in a > specification change. > > The latest time-stamped specification can be found here: > > http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/ > > A diff-marked copy from the previous version can be found here: > > http://json-ld.org/spec/ED/json-ld-syntax/20120122/diff-20120112.html > > This is the type of editorial review we go through before heading into > Last Call at W3C... so, the document is in /very/ good shape. > > The only glaring issues that remain are the ones surrounding @list: > > https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/44 > https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/52 > https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/60 > > We're very, very close to feature freeze for the JSON-LD Syntax. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout > http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/ > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 09:37:25 UTC