Re: Timeline and priorities

On Jan 12, 2012, at 15:46 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:

> On  Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:18 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: 
>> We will have to have a separate discussion on how this should proceed
>> at W3C. *If* we decide to have a separate group on that (in contrast to
>> piggyback it on another group, which is a possibility), than we have to
> 
> Which groups could you think of?

At the moment, the RDF WG still has the JSON serialization on its charter...

Ivan


> 
> 
>> have a charter formulated and accepted by the AC. Then the question is:
>> would this charter include the API and the normalization? If that is
>> the intention, we may have to wait until we are sure that this is
>> doable, which is I guess what Manu had in mind. Because setting up a WG
>> is an administratively not-light process, having a separate WG on the
>> syntax and yet another one on the API may look like an overkill...
> 
> Thanks for explaining this Ivan!
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf