On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:18 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: > We will have to have a separate discussion on how this should proceed > at W3C. *If* we decide to have a separate group on that (in contrast to > piggyback it on another group, which is a possibility), than we have to Which groups could you think of? > have a charter formulated and accepted by the AC. Then the question is: > would this charter include the API and the normalization? If that is > the intention, we may have to wait until we are sure that this is > doable, which is I guess what Manu had in mind. Because setting up a WG > is an administratively not-light process, having a separate WG on the > syntax and yet another one on the API may look like an overkill... Thanks for explaining this Ivan! -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthalerReceived on Thursday, 12 January 2012 15:13:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:33 UTC