RE: Timeline and priorities

On  Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:18 PM, Ivan Herman wrote: 
> We will have to have a separate discussion on how this should proceed
> at W3C. *If* we decide to have a separate group on that (in contrast to
> piggyback it on another group, which is a possibility), than we have to

Which groups could you think of?


> have a charter formulated and accepted by the AC. Then the question is:
> would this charter include the API and the normalization? If that is
> the intention, we may have to wait until we are sure that this is
> doable, which is I guess what Manu had in mind. Because setting up a WG
> is an administratively not-light process, having a separate WG on the
> syntax and yet another one on the API may look like an overkill...

Thanks for explaining this Ivan!



--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler