- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:52:48 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 09/06/2011 01:59 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > Sorry, that I couldn't attend todays telecon. As I understand the minutes > there is now consensus that > > 1. we split the spec > 2. move normalization to an ext. document > 3. merge @base and @vocab > > Right!? The consensus on the call was: 1. Split the spec into obvious parts (syntax vs. API), but for the time being, while we are still making a decent number of changes, keep it in a single document. 2. Move normalization algorithm into a more generalized graph normalization document, but keep the normalize() call in the API part of the spec. 3. Keep @base and @vocab separate, DO NOT merge them, but provide better language in the spec for why they are necessary and different. > Another quick question. We have 2 issue trackers (GitHub's and W3C's) now.. > are we continuing to use GitHub or do we plan to move everything over to W3C > to have better integration between the tools (IRC, mailing list, issue > tracker)? I think we're sticking with github for the moment, you may be the first person to bring up a possible change. > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-linked-json-request@w3.org [mailto:public-linked-json- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Kellogg >> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:22 PM >> To: public-linked-json@w3.org JSON >> Subject: Minutes for Sept 6 telecon >> >> In today's telecon [1]: split keep spec whole, move normalization to >> external document, keep @base and @vocab. Further discussion on >> optimizing compact form and other micro-syntaxes. >> >> Thanks to Dave Lehn for scribing! >> >> Gregg >> >> [1] http://json-ld.org/minutes/2011-09-06/ > > -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 18:53:14 UTC