W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Split JSON-LD spec

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:48:38 -0400
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <949C0F99-D2C1-4C36-971A-FB4B3DEC81F2@greggkellogg.net>


Gregg

On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>>> 1. JSON-LD (the language)
>> 
>> What about "JSON-LD Publishing" ? So that the title of both documents
>> is straightforward to understand depending which side you're in
> 
> My intention was to name this spec just "JSON-LD". I just put "the language"
> in parenthesis to explain what it should contain. JSON-LD Publishing sounds
> too much like a how-to for me; "JSON-LD Syntax", as proposed by Kingsley,
> would be a better alternative in my opinion.

Agreed.

But, to follow Manu's point, we're probably best to leave the two specs combined for the time being. We can ensure that there is a syntax section that essentially forms the body of a separate syntax document. When separating documents, it becomes too easy for them to go out of sync.

> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 00:49:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:32 UTC