Re: Split JSON-LD spec

Gregg

On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>>> 1. JSON-LD (the language)
>> 
>> What about "JSON-LD Publishing" ? So that the title of both documents
>> is straightforward to understand depending which side you're in
> 
> My intention was to name this spec just "JSON-LD". I just put "the language"
> in parenthesis to explain what it should contain. JSON-LD Publishing sounds
> too much like a how-to for me; "JSON-LD Syntax", as proposed by Kingsley,
> would be a better alternative in my opinion.

Agreed.

But, to follow Manu's point, we're probably best to leave the two specs combined for the time being. We can ensure that there is a syntax section that essentially forms the body of a separate syntax document. When separating documents, it becomes too easy for them to go out of sync.

> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
>