- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:48:38 -0400
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Gregg On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >>> 1. JSON-LD (the language) >> >> What about "JSON-LD Publishing" ? So that the title of both documents >> is straightforward to understand depending which side you're in > > My intention was to name this spec just "JSON-LD". I just put "the language" > in parenthesis to explain what it should contain. JSON-LD Publishing sounds > too much like a how-to for me; "JSON-LD Syntax", as proposed by Kingsley, > would be a better alternative in my opinion. Agreed. But, to follow Manu's point, we're probably best to leave the two specs combined for the time being. We can ensure that there is a syntax section that essentially forms the body of a separate syntax document. When separating documents, it becomes too easy for them to go out of sync. > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 September 2011 00:49:41 UTC