Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2011-07-04

That is a shame, since the original goal was that JSON-LD (nee RDFj)
should be able to achieve both.



On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:07 PM, glenn mcdonald <glenn@furia.com> wrote:
>> I'd be happy if you stayed, it's great to have many different perspectives
>> on things :)
>
> Thanks for saying so, but I don't think my "perspective" is helping here.
> I'm personally and professionally interested in a simple JSON convention for
> serializing graphs. I subscribed to this mailing list because it sounded
> like this might be a community of interest in that idea. But I think this
> thing Manu is after, using @context to layer some IRIs onto "normal" JSON,
> is actually a different topic. Better for the people interested in that
> topic to keep working on it to the satisfaction of their own needs and
> constraints, rather than having to put up with me trying to bend the
> conversation into mine.
> glenn

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 14:53:43 UTC