RE: "LD", consensus achieved. from Markus Lanthaler on 2011-08-03 (public-linked-json@w3.org from August 2011)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:44:25 +0200
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00e701cc51db$145f2850$3d1d78f0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

> On 7/28/11 9:47 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> >> Me too re:
> >>
> >> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or;
> >> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD*
> >> re. de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases.
>
> Yes!

+1 for both but it's not really clear for me which of the two options was chosen!? I would prefer 2.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 12:44:54 UTC