- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:48:38 -0400
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
On 8/3/11 8:44 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: >> On 7/28/11 9:47 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>> Me too re: >>>> >>>> 1. "JSON for Linking Data" or; >>>> 2. "LD" meaning "Linked Data" where we leverage the use of *SHOULD* >>>> re. de-referencavble IRIs to accommodate Blank Node edge cases. >> Yes! > +1 for both but it's not really clear for me which of the two options was chosen!? I would prefer 2. +1 re. SHOULD or MAY. I hear we've now gone for MAY? Kingsley > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 15:49:11 UTC