Re: Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions

On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:39, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:

> On 26 Mar 2013, at 09:15, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:06, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 02:35, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>>>> Something like "text/turtle;profile=http://ldp.net/ldpr" would be really
>>>> cool as it could be applied to any (past or future) RDF format and
>>>> mostly ignored by clients/servers that don't understand it.
>>> 
>>> That would be ok with me.
>> 
>> I have argued before this is the wrong place to put that information, and
>> that it has nothing to do with the mime type.
> 
> True, but if it's just a parameter on the media type then we can mostly just ignore it…

I don't think we're here to create standards that we will ignore in order
to help some people overcome problems that they only thought existed.

> 
> Richard
> 
> 
>> 
>> Henry
>> 
>>> 
>>> Richard
>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 09:42:20 UTC