Re: Section 4: LDPR/non-LDPR formal definitions

On 26 Mar 2013, at 09:15, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:06, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 26 Mar 2013, at 02:35, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>>> Something like "text/turtle;profile=http://ldp.net/ldpr" would be really
>>> cool as it could be applied to any (past or future) RDF format and
>>> mostly ignored by clients/servers that don't understand it.
>> 
>> That would be ok with me.
> 
> I have argued before this is the wrong place to put that information, and
> that it has nothing to do with the mime type.

True, but if it's just a parameter on the media type then we can mostly just ignore it…

Richard


> 
> Henry
> 
>> 
>> Richard
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 09:39:23 UTC