W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp@w3.org > November 2012

Re: LDP would benefit from being RESTful

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:13:09 -0500
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Cc: public-ldp@w3.org, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Message-ID: <1353100389.2634.12793.camel@dbooth-laptop>
On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 19:57 +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Wednesday 14. November 2012 13.58.33 David Booth wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 10:28 -0800, Erik Wilde wrote:
> > > [ . . .  ] RDF isn't 
> > > RESTful it itself because it's not a hypermedia format. 
> > 
> > Huh?  I'm baffled by that comment.  Why do you say RDF is not a
> > hypermedia format?   For one thing, RDF is composed almost entirely of
> > URIs, i.e., links.  How much more link-ful can you get?  
> Erik is partially right: By itself, RDF is a hypermedia format only on a 
> very, very superficial level. 
> I'd like to encourage everybody to do the exercise to go Mike Amundsen's 
> hypermedia classification: http://amundsen.com/hypermedia/hfactor/
> You will quickly realize that RDF, out of the box, is a hypermedia only on 
> the LO level.

Ah-ha!  Now I see what Erik meant.  Just to be clear on terminology,
AFAIK Amundsen's requirements go *far* beyond the conventional
definition of "hypermedia"
as Amundsen's requirements are all about supporting hypermedia
*applications*, which of course is what we want to do with LDP and
Hypermedia As The Engine Of Application State (HATEOAS)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HATEOAS .
Mike's H Factor summary is excellent!

> However, as I show in my ESWC LAPIS2012 presentation, see
> http://folk.uio.no/kjekje/2012/lapis2012.xhtml
> RDF can be made to be a very powerful hypermedia type by fairly trivial 
> means. In fact, it can easily meet all but one of Amundsen's criteria (I 
> just realised that LE can be met using data URIs).
> I've been talking with people F2F on ISWC about this, and I hope I have 
> convinced some that this is the direction one should be going. And I really 
> don't think this is out of the scope of the charter, to the contrary, if 
> this is done right, it is what the charter really means. :-)

Very nice!  It looks like an excellent direction to me!  

David Booth, Ph.D.

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 21:13:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:33 UTC