Re: Comments #2 on Primer

Thanks Sandro / Eugene for the review !!
We will fix the highlighted issues in ACTION-158.

Best Regards,
Nandana

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>  Comments from another student, below.
>
>          -- Sandro
>
> On 03/17/2015 02:42 PM, Eugene Oh wrote:
>
>
>  As I was reading through there were a couple of things that caught my
> eye.  In the section titled "LDP concepts in a glance" there was just a
> minor error in the sentence above Figure 4.  "For example, a Bug Report *is
> has* an associated list of Comments as well as supportive media
> resources." The "is" should be deleted.
>
>  In Section 2.7 Structural Manipulation:
> "Alice *express* her intention that the newly created resource should be
> an LDP Basic Container by including a Link header in the request with the
> relationship 'type'."
> Should be expresses.
>
>  Section 3 Bug tracker Example:
> "This allows to *define relationship* between any other information
> resource or non-information resource (real world thing) by defining the
> membership constant subject or the object URI of the membership triples
> using ldp:membershipResource predicate of the Direct Container."
> define relationships?  or define a relationship?
>
>  Section 4.1
> "While the object of the containment triple is the same (e.g.
> </tracker/ldp-demo/bug3>, an information resource) the object of the
> membership triple is *now (e.g. </tracker/ldp-demo/bug3#it>, a
> non-information resource or real world thing)*"
> Should the closing parenthesis be after the ">"?
>
>  As far as overall understanding, after reading more about RDF and the
> use of triples to describe resources, I was able to follow the primer
> without much trouble.
>
>  Best,
> Eugene
>
>
>