W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Comments #2 on Primer

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:30:52 -0400
Message-ID: <550AEBAC.4010901@w3.org>
To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
CC: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Eugene Oh <eugeneoh@mit.edu>
Comments from another student, below.

          -- Sandro

On 03/17/2015 02:42 PM, Eugene Oh wrote:
> As I was reading through there were a couple of things that caught my 
> eye.  In the section titled "LDP concepts in a glance" there was just 
> a minor error in the sentence above Figure 4.  "For example, a Bug 
> Report *is has* an associated list of Comments as well as supportive 
> media resources." The "is" should be deleted.
> In Section 2.7 Structural Manipulation:
> "Alice *express* her intention that the newly created resource should 
> be an LDP Basic Container by including a Link header in the request 
> with the relationship 'type'."
> Should be expresses.
> Section 3 Bug tracker Example:
> "This allows to *define relationship* between any other information 
> resource or non-information resource (real world thing) by defining 
> the membership constant subject or the object URI of the membership 
> triples using ldp:membershipResource predicate of the Direct Container."
> define relationships?  or define a relationship?
> Section 4.1
> "While the object of the containment triple is the same (e.g. 
> </tracker/ldp-demo/bug3>, an information resource) the object of the 
> membership triple is *now (e.g. </tracker/ldp-demo/bug3#it>, a 
> non-information resource or real world thing)*"
> Should the closing parenthesis be after the ">"?
> As far as overall understanding, after reading more about RDF and the 
> use of triples to describe resources, I was able to follow the primer 
> without much trouble.
> Best,
> Eugene
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 15:30:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:53 UTC