- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:29:35 +0200
- To: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Cc: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 6 Jun 2014, at 14:38, Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Henry, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> I like the edits you made to the text in the introduction. You left three issues in the introduction section, and I've got a few comments. >>>>> >>>>> Issue 1: >>>>> it is true that o:hasDoc is not defined. It should be, I agree. Or do you know of a well known bit of vocab we can re-use ? As for your question about what it adds in addition to ldp:contains, it allows domain vocabulary to be used to describe the relation. >>>> >>>> Don't know really. You were the one arguing that this case is an important one. >>> >>> Well, it allows people to be more domain-specific about describing the relationship between two resources ... That's an important and it is what a DirectContainer allows one to do. >> >> It should be easy to find an easy to understand real use case for this then. > > > ahh ... I've got it. You are saying that "hasDoc" and "contains" are both generic words. > But, this example is a online Document store - and one could argue that "hasDoc" is actually domain vocab ... Iit is a best practice to publish a vocabulary at the URL of the vocabulary. So the vocabularies you use should do that. Furthermore it is a best practice to do something that is meaningful, but for the moment we don't understand what this example is, since we don't understand what this o:hasDoc relation is. It is a best practice to re-use existing vocabulary, but this is not an existing vocabulary. And furthermore the point was made during the ldp spec writing that there were big need for all these features, so I am just waiting to see one that makes sense that is not just made up. It should be possible to find a real case of a relation between a container and document that would do. Perhaps sioc:container_of http://sioc-project.org/ontology#term_container_of > > Roger > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 15:30:09 UTC