Re: Primer

>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Henry, 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks. 
>>>> 
>>>> I like the edits you made to the text in the introduction. You left three issues in the introduction section, and I've got a few comments. 
>>>> 
>>>> Issue 1: 
>>>> it is true that o:hasDoc is not defined. It should be, I agree. Or do you know of a well known bit of vocab we can re-use ? As for your question about what it adds in addition to ldp:contains, it allows domain vocabulary to be used to describe the relation. 
>>> 
>>> Don't know really. You were the one arguing that this case is an important one.
>> 
>> Well, it allows people to be more domain-specific about describing the relationship between two resources ... That's an important and it is what a DirectContainer allows one to do. 
> 
> It should be easy to find an easy to understand real use case for this then. 


ahh ... I've got it. You are saying that "hasDoc" and "contains" are both generic words. 
But, this example is a online Document store - and one could argue that "hasDoc" is actually domain vocab ...

Roger