- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 15:01:06 -0400
- To: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFC82DFDFD.2D8FC3C3-ON85257D2B.00676871-85257D2B.00687950@us.ibm.com>
Sandro > > Awesome. Do we want to try to publish Thursday? On this week's call we said we'd give folks this week to review/object or not, so if you mean Aug 7, I think not. Plus I know you're still working on a better rdf:List for the moment. Arnaud > John, > Could you please add to the status of the document some mention of > the split so that the reader understands that there was a split? Live at [1]. We also need to specify a review period end date, which I don't recall discussing this week. Note to whomever builds the official draft: ReSpec lets us specify the previous draft URI (and it's there), but I noticed (after zapping ED to LC locally) that it's ignoring the value in practice; it gives me (note: *with* paging) Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-paging-20130730/ which not == to previousURI: " http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-ldp-20130730/",. It's probably easiest to zap-fix that in the generated html file. Presumably the pubrules link checker would fail it otherwise. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/23fdc671c3f2 changeset Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 19:01:40 UTC