- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:08:55 -0400
- To: "Linked Data Platform Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFF0604E7D.B58F7019-ON85257D2C.00517C2B-85257D2C.00533748@us.ibm.com>
Per Sandro's email [4] and his subsequent personal offline consultation with a cast of reportedly bored/annoyed LD luminaries and paparazzi (which sadly led to no better alternative than [4], but at least more attempts), I put up the live changes [1] [2] [3]. Example 18 (use [3] and page up 2 examples) shows the net result. I called the link relation ldp:pageSequence, since that's really the shark we've been quietly jumping over. I did not add a corresponding ldp:PageSequence type to the content asserted by that link, although I could if the WG so consensus-es. 7.3.2 [3] was the primary normative change, for the link relation name change + adding the ldp:sortCriteria triple as required; since the LDP-RS requirement seemed natural in 7.3.2, it moved out of 7.3.3. The nose cone is as bright and shiny as it gets, in terms of comments on normative content being resolved. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/rev/197199f27d16 changeset [2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html [3] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp-paging.html#ldpc-HTTP_GET normative changes [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Aug/0012.html Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 15:09:32 UTC